This Old Lair

Free as a Bird

SPACE: The Final Frontier.

Captain Weasel welcomes you to the home of Weasel Virtual Airlines

Pics

Links

FlightSim Links

Flight Sim comparison

The following is my opinion on the topic of the moment. You are not obligated to support or even read it. If you find yourself getting offended you may click the back button, your home page button, a favorites link, or the 'X' in the top right corner. You are not trapped here so if you do get upset or enraged you have no one to blame but yourself.

1Apr:

Most of the media is doing a pretty good job with war coverage. That one ex-CNN/NBC dude, Peter 'puffer' Arnett joins Saddam as a camel crotch muncher however. Get on the winning side, asshat. BTW, Arnett has already been hired by the Daily Mirror in London. You, at the Mirror, must be so proud of him. I bet he came cheap. You too, are asshats. Enjoy your new status. Hell, move to London, Arnett, you came from New Zealand any way.

BTW, yeah I linked FoxNews in the last oped and I know they are biased but they're biased to my side so I like them. We have troops in the field, the time to support them is now. I just can't understand how any asshole can live in this country and yet not support the government and the troops that defend their right to be an asshole. You hypocritical bastards, the time for debate is over. Indecicivness is what the enemy thrives on. They see divided support and think if they just hold out long enough our will will crumble and they will win, ala Vietnam. I'd like to point out that that war took 10 years! Do you want to wait 10 more years, feeding your sons/daughters into the meat grinder or do you want to end this thing quickly by showing them that there's no way they can win; by showing that we are determined to oust the Saddam regime and be rid of one more snake?

Would you stupid asses have had us ignore Germany after Japan attacked us? Just go after Japan and leave Hitler alone because Germany didn't attack us directly? Or would you idiots waste time negotiating? Maybe give Japan the west coast so they will not attack us any more? (maybe a good idea) Or would you get your mean on and go kick some ass where ever an ass needed kicked? You stupid pussies would probably just negotiate the whole country away as long as you weren't threatened. You 'peace above all' assholes really piss me off. You think the whole world is as commited to peace as you are and the US is the only ones still holding guns and we should just throw down our arms. Yeah, maybe we should disarm the police first then all the criminals will get rid of their guns too and then no cops will get killed and then peace will break out and we can all sit around and smoke dope all day and maybe aliens will come down to be our slaves and serve us. Yeah, peace is the way, peace at all costs as long as you don't get harmed. Pathetic...

I don't have all the answers but you peacebillies don't have any answers. Go lay in a street and shut the hell up.

God save us from the spoiled children of '70s for they now think they have all the answers that we have been seeking, amen.

Hmm, I just had another thought (ouch). If you have kids of draft age and are against the war for that reason I absolve thee from my wrath. For my part, my boys are a few years from draft age so I'd like to see this wrapped up soon. Hey, I never said I was perfect or objective. Imagine being a parent in 1964 and having a son 9 years old with Vietnam going on every night on the news like it does now. Then watching that son grow up for 10 years and then having him get sent off to that same war that was going on when he was 9. I missed such a fate by a couple of years. I enlisted when I was 19 (there was no draft by then) and I picked my MOS 95B (MP) and opted for Germany. You could pick your MOS or your location. I wonder how many guys said 'I'll do whatever, I just want to be near *your hometown here*'? Anyway, I got Germany because at that time Germany was wide open. A great deal, but I was 19 and defending the nation from the Red Menice. We were ready too. We trained for the day that Russia would invade. We or at least me, wanted Russia to invade (stupid kids). They never came. That doesn't mean we were'nt willing to do our part and in fact we knew that all we could do was buy time for the follow on forces to arrive. We expected one month, that was our mission, to buy the free world one month. Not so fags could spend that month arguing about weather we should do something or not but one month to get forces in place to defend the free world. Never the less we trained, we had alerts, we went to the field, we went on 'Reforger'. Hell, we had a great time but none of it was real.

Iraq is real and I can empathize. Hell yes, I support my troops if for no other reason than that could have been me if I was youger. I know something of what it is like to be in battle (simulated). These guys and gals are the same as I was those years ago so I can say that these are the best and brightest of our youth and may God bless them all. If you don't support them or you call them 'invaders, pirates, mercenaries', or you wish them a "a million Mogadishus" (you son of a bitch), eat it. They have my support and I'll kick your ass if you are an American citizen or some coattail riding freeloader and advocate fighting or killing them. Peter Arnett, you suck, traitor. De Genova, you are worse than Arnett so use your pathetic imagination as to how I feel about you, you bastard. I'd love to kick you in the nuts if you had any. Damn, there goes my job with CNN.

24 Mar:

My two bits on the war (yes, we have a war now) with Iraq. I have been watching Fox News from day one. At first I was born again hard. Then I started getting feelings of trepidation as I watched the 3rd ID (my old Division btw) charging across the desert seemingly unprotected. I might even say I was against the war for a few hours. But as things progressed and some of our people were captured, some were killed and when I heard what had happened and how some of these troops had been killed and how some had been treated after being captured, I was reminded of just why our troops are there. The Saddam regime is an evil entidy. They only understand violence. Saddam has been strutting around for the last 12 years boasting about facing down the evil USA. I'm fine with that, the US stands on it's actions not on rhetoric. But after a time Saddam seems to have forgotten that it was the coalition backing out that saved his ass. He didn't win at all and was a few days away from being hauled before a UN tribunal. But we backed off and look at the mess that has brought.
At any rate, the war is afoot, the President will not, and I feel should not, pull the troops out at this point. What this oped is about is the self important 'anti-war protesters'.

Back in the olden days, when the Vietnam War was going on we had protesters. Mostly guys facing the draft and they seized on any excuse to get the war to end before their number came up. These days there are protesters all over the world. None of whom face being drafted and thrown into a meat grinder. This, one might interpret as more sincere. I don't, I see them as children throwing fits because their government won't do what they want. Some of these pathetic losers are in Hollywood not suprisingly. This includes one Michael Moore, a particularly vile individual who used the platform at the academy awards to spout some slop about the rather old election and against the war. (There is a clip showing it there under video.) He's a prick. But really, hasn't the time for protesting this war passed. The pathetic protestors have lost, the war is afoot. Get over it, Gore lost and Saddam is going down. This is a good thing so shut up and support the troops and the President. There are people in this world who would not do anything even if they had a gun stuck in their own stupid faces.

By the way Michael Moore, if you were in Baghdad you would be in prison or dead in the desert by now for what you said, don't forget that. And the election was 3 years ago. Don't you think you should get over it now? If he and his ilk had their way we'd still be counting ballots. Hell, I bet Al Gore is glad he lost. He's at Apple now and I think he'd just as soon that you shut up about him. I sure as hell wouldn't want you speaking for me.

I'm amazed at people like Moore who wouldn't have anything if they had to work for a living. They get rich off of our money and only because they live in this great country where we have cash to spend. But when the sons and daughters (how PC of me) of these same people who have made them rich get sent off to defend the way of life that has made them rich, all they can do is spout the kind of garbage that Michael Moore did. Here's a clue, look at an aerial photo of Baghdad. There are no marinas, no yachts. How much money do you think you'd have over there?

Saddam and his ilk only understand violence. He tossed the UN out and only let them back in after we started beating the war drums. However, his intensions were to lead the inspectors around on a leash and play hide and seek with them. The time for that has passed. How long would you have us wait Mr. Moore? Forever I guess if your still fretting over an election that was held in 2000. I think your the one living in a fantasy. Shame on you, Mr. Moore. Shame on you.

6 Mar 03:

Now, if Saddam were to quit screwing around and let the UN inspectors look where they want to look and prove that Iraq has no weapons on mass destruction (as everybody has taken to calling them) and/or surrendered any such weapons I think it would end there. He would remain in power and we would get on with our business. Note it's the UN that's doing inspections, not US so it's not like the US is pushing poor little Iraq around. (Yeah, yeah, 'the US runs the UN wahh wahhh'. Save it.) But Saddam is acting like a kid who got caught stealing. He's hemming and hawing and delaying the inevitable. We will find out if he's hiding atomic or bio weapons, one way or another. Get used to the idea. We don't like having a gun pointed at our or our allies head.

Alot of the world, or maybe just the noisy part, seems to think we should just walk away and leave Saddam and Iraq alone to do whatever it is they want to do. They seem to want the good times to keep going. 'Global Protest against the war', how nice. Let's just put our head in the sand and ignore an obvious threat. If you had a rattlesnake loose in your house would you just ignore it since it was just sleeping in a corner. Would you go on and just hope nobody got bitten or would you hunt it down? We choose not to ignore the threat of madman Saddam. Though he calls himself 'President' he is not an elected official, his government is not a body of leaders chosen by the people with the peoples interests in mind. He is a dictator and his cabinet is a bunch of his henchmen, all intent on staying in power, letting the good times keep on rolling. He still thinks he won in Desert Storm.

We ignored the taliban and Al-Queda. World and popular opinion would not allow us to meddle in thier affairs so we didn't and we got punished for turning our back on that situation. Now we are being told to do the same thing again. Fool us once, shame on you - fool us twice, shame on us. We will not be caught again. If that ruffles feathers so be it.

Once upon a time there was a loudmouth in Lybia making threats. We dealt with him by beating him to the draw. When's the last time you heard of Qudaffi? That action was met with disapproval but I think we can count it as a success. He learned that he would be held accountable. Saddam needs to learn the same lesson. He refuses to learn from history.

We will not allow super weapons in the hands of lunatics. We will not be threatened by lunatics and we will not, without retribution, be attacked by lunatics. If that's a problem too bad. Is everybody supposed to just hope the 'Butcher of Bagdad' doesn't get mad and sling some bio weapon at Isreal or even Iran or Saudi Arabia. Are we supposed to hope he doesn't get mad at us? Are we supposed to just be glad we weren't in the Trade Towers? Are we supposed to rely on being lucky? Um, hell no. We should and will remove those weapons and if that takes an invasion that's what we'll do. We had a chance in 1991 to zip him up but chickened out. Saddam has had 12 years to learn from his mistakes and we have learned from ours. Like it or not, America is cleaning house. Choose a side or get out of the way. It will happen this time.

30Sep:

Ok, once upon a time there was a thing called 'Napster'. A P2P setup where users could swap songs. Granted , there was some abuse going on. People could and would download entire new albums and have to pay nothing. OK, that was a bad thing. Maybe some would buy the CD at some point. I don't know. I first hooked up with napster when I bought a CD to get one song (Louis Armstrong: What a Wonderful World). However the song was a different version of the one I was after. Also not labeled as a 'pick up' version, which it was and not what I thought I was paying for. So I went to napster and glomed the version I wanted. Viola, no muss, no fuss. Well, then I thought why not grab up some stuff from albums I have so I don't have to wear out my vinyl? So I started doing that. Then it I decided to grab up some tunes I like on the radio so I can hear them whenever I want instead of being at the mercy of the program director. After all, what's the difference if I tape them off the radio or grab them from the net? Nothing I say.

The RIAA is trying to kill off all mp3's and file swapping. They want you to go out and pay $20 or so for a whole CD when you really only want one tune. They don't have a problem with that. I do. In the old vinyl days, I would go out and pay $8 for a record just to get one song. (Ever hear of Toronto: Get it on Credit? I have that album.) There were usually some other songs that didn't get played on the radio but were still good. However, today, I don't have the inclination to go buy entire albums just for one song I like from the radio and I sure don't have the time to sit there waiting for the station to play the song I want so I can tape it. I just pop on to a P2P and grab it. Usually I don't really even listen to it much after that but I know I have it if I want it. No harm, no foul I say. RIAA disagrees. As far as they're concerned, I should go out and buy the CD or tape just to have that one song available. Do they have a problem with me taping it from a radio station? Probably, but they aren't trying to invade my privacy to stop taping off of radio. And they do get royalties from radio stations for whatever songs they play. Granted, they don't get anything if I download it but they don't get anything if I tape it either. Same thing with movies. Movies are viewable as taped off of cable. Not reproduceable, but viewable. Same with songs from the radio. And here's what RIAA's makes their case on- quality.
They say that there is no degradation in quality on a digital copy, therefore they should be paid. I say they're lying and they know it. The copy you download is still a copy. It may or may not be good. One has to try it out to see. It's still not an original. It get's compressed, uncompressed, recompressed and then uncompressed everytime it's played. They get copied at different bit rates. It may not even play. One never knows what one is getting. Much the same as taping off of the radio. They also use the argument that a movie can be downloaded in half the time it takes to play it. Well, maybe not much of an argument but they use that as propaganda to buy congressmen and/or senators' votes. It's also bullshit and they know it. Not that it matters to the case at all but it makes it sound more like a scam to whomever they're pitching it to. Politicians can't stand the common man getting one over so RIAA trots out that little gem at pitch time. The fact is I never, ever got hooked up at that speed. The best I have ever gotten is about twice the play time but usually at least 3 times and that is on a very good connection.

And finally, some tips to the fine folks at RIAA. Here's a clue and it's free. Just because you choose to pay some no talent slutty looking teenager or boy band way too much and buy play time on MTV doesn't mean you can expect, nay demand that we buy the albums. If they stink, the consumers will know it and not buy your product. Also, we will only buy so many remakes. If the movie stunk before, chances are it will stink again. Again, we will know it and not buy your products. On the same note, digitally remastering stuff and putting it on DVD is not going to get us out there buying either. That's called 'Polishing the cannonball'. Say Ford wanted to rerelease the pinto, would you run out and buy it because it has a more efficient engine and a never before used color of paint? I don't think so. Stop blaming P2P and everybody for your own inadequesies and get to making something worth buying. If it's good we will come. If it sucks we will know it. We are not the morons you take us for. Dance monkeys, dance. Or find something you're good at like whining, sniveling, blame shifting and bribery.

28 Aug:

I feel the need to vent and now you all must suffer, sorry. Today I'm ranting about...well, why commit to one topic? I have recently abandoned one of the forums that I used to go to several times a day. I left because it is frequented by liberal, over tolerant, touchy feely anti American jerks. Well, that's my opinion anyway. The overall impression I got from them was they believed, and one guy said as much, that we deserved to be attacked by those son's of bitches. That was the last straw, I left before I blew up. Anyway, I was called racist, faciaist and right-wing for saying the middle east is not an advanced society. OK, I called them morons, still what I meant was not an advanced society. I was accused of thinking of them as less than human. I was also accused of believing everything the media says. This for me is the worst insult you can accuse me of. If I heard on the news that it was dark at night I'd check for myself. They are a bunch of self important, primadonas who are too lazy to check the facts for themselves. I never watch the news and if I want to find out about something, I read the paper. They, at least, take the time to check most stories and give more than 10 seconds of information. But we're not here for that.

Back to the subject, some 'foreign nationals' were welcomed into our country as is everyone with proper documentation. They came here with the worst of intent but we welcomed them anyway. We assume that everyone is here because they like our way of life and believe in our system. They lived here among us and enjoyed our way of life and then coldly attacked the very nation that had welcomed them in. There's no need to detail it here but I see nothing 'smart' or 'intelligent' in the plan. If you crash planes into buildings you get headlines. Nothing sophisticated there. You could, at that time, walk through airport security with box knives and carpet cutters. Nothing intelligent there. The stock market and many companies have taken a beating. Does this have anything to do with the attacks? I don't think so. The economy is simply settling after 10 years or so of artificial growth epitimized by the great dot com gold rush. The terrorists certaintly didn't understand our economy enough to plan it's collapse. Even if they did, it failed anyway. Nothing smart about it there. I heard about how bin Landen was an engineer and had planned to the towers to collapse then he himself admitted that he didn't know what would happen but thought the top floors might collapse. Oops, media types missed that one. So hijack planes with knives, crash planes into second most famous buildings in the country, get famous. Not a really brilliant plan at all.
So they hate us. Did they petition the middle eastern nations to stop contact with America and drive us from the middle east? No. Did they compete with us on the global market and try to drive us from the global market? No. Did they refuse to sell us oil and cause us to pay more for fuel? No. They did nothing but grab the headlines in a childish tantrum thrown by one little spoiled rich boy. A spoiled little rich boy who never leads any of these great jihads that he calls for. Yet you always see him with a rifle. What cheap propoganda. But the 'intelligent, sophisticated' middle easterners buy it.
Ok, so what comes out of the middle east? Oil, yeah. Do they make it? No, it's in the ground. They just let us suck it out. Do they make cars? No, rockets? No, radios, TVs, airplanes, computers, ocean liners? Uh, no. They even go to other countries to get a higher education. The only thing they make is hate. Hate against those that do make those things. Things they use everyday and yet they hate us for it. I say again, the middle east is not an advanced society. And you can quote me.

10 Aug 02:

Well, let's see what I come up with today.
Today's topic is one nobody really cares about: Evolution vs Creation.

Pretty mild I know. Anywho, there are basically two theories. One has been around in varying forms for thousands of years and the other has come about in recent years and yet has become wildly popular with the so called intellectuals.
Ok here goes the most famous: Once upon a time the was an all powerful deity. He was lonely and decided he would make a sort of galactic terrarium. He made the heavens and the Earth. He made the creatures that inhabited this place. And it was good and all. Then He decided it needed more so He created Man. This is where I think He went awry. Ungrateful, spoiled mankind then proceeded to screw up everything. Fast forward to today and you can see where this one ends up.

Version 2: Once upon a time there was a particle of preeminent matter. It appeared out of nowhere I suppose. This was a really small particle, hence the name 'particle'. Well, this particle one day did what all preeminent particles do, it exploded and became um, everything. All the planets, the stars, the asteroids, everything came from this particle. Well, that was nice but there was nothing there. Along came meteors and asteroids. These space rocks crashed into the earth (which of course had no name at that time) and oh, guess what, those meteors and asteroids just happened to be carrying some stuff that when combined, made enzymes. (I guess the ingredients couldn't mix while they were all in the preeminent partcle.) These enzymes decided that they didn't like being enzymes and became single celled organisms. (I may have missed a few steps but you get the idea). Naturally, the single cells didn't like being single cells so they decided to subdivide (or combine and form a gang, who knows). Now they were 'multicell organisms'. This too was not good enough so they became floating stuff. Slime really I guess. Ok, this too was not good enough, so they decided to become fish or something. Naturally fish was not good enough so now they decided to crawl up on land and see what was there. They stayed eventually. Yada yada, They became monkeys. Monkeys wanted to not be monkeys so decided to become man. How or why they reached these decisions is not known but the theory holds that they did. Well except for some monkeys decided that they liked being monkeys so stayed monkeys. Of course some 'fish' decided they wanted to be food so became cows, chickens, pigs. Some even wanted to stay fish. We still have single celled life forms and even enzymes too. So why didn't these leftovers evolve? Who knows, they just didn't.
So are we a product of this random happenstance and are just really lucky or is there a grand plan involving some, dare I say it in these P.C. times, God? That's for you to decide. I, your humble webmaster and opionated old geezer would never deem to tell you what to believe. You're on your own.

If you're wondering where the alien theory is, I ask you where did the aliens come from? Now we're back to square one. So there ya go.

01 MAY

Well here I am again. Another oped coming your way. Today's topic starts off being about working women. I don't mean women who fall on hard times and have to work for their (usually abandoned) kids. I'm talking about working women that don't have to work but choose to have a career. Sexist? You bet. Let's get that out of the way now. A long time ago, when I was a kid and up until lately, the vast majority of women were raised to and only wanted to be married to a good man and stay at home and raise some good kids. Don't like the sound of that? Too bad, that's the way it was. Women believed that it was important to stay home and raise good kids. If they found extra time then they found some charity or maybe took in some sewing or something but the main focus was to teach their kids how to act.They also took care of the home, took care of the money and anything involved in running the home. And made it look easy. The old man was to pay for the required supplies and shut up and mow the lawn and say 'Yes, Dear' alot etc. This system had worked for thousands of years. Then the women got a taste of the working world during WW II and for some reason thought it was fun. Apparantly, getting a check with their own name on it was some big deal to them. For the most part, after the war, they went back home and took over the important work of running the home.
Somewhere in the 1980s women got the idea that they should have 'careers'. This was also the era of the 'sensitive man'. Men were supposed to be sensitive and caring wimps. Not the manly dudes that built this great nation, indeed, forged all great nations of the world. No, caring and sensitive. That was supposed to be the man of the 80s. Turns out, that wasn't such a good idea and women wanted the manly man back by the mid 90s. They also wanted the careers. Hmm, the old cake and eat it too syndrome. That doesn't work, sister. Anyway, guess what. Business types, who were the first to be sensitive and tell the wife 'sure dear, you should have a career too', decided that since wives were working too they could charge more for luxuries. Ever bitch about having to pay $15,000 for a run about car? Guess why that is. Yup, the car makers think you are either single or have a wife working and can pay 20 grand for a car. Everything costs more because of this 'extra income' we all supposedly have. So now your extra money from the wife working gets ate up by extra cost. She has to have a car to get to work and so do you. She can't drop you at the bus stop and keep the car. You can't take the car either. You have to buy 2 of these over priced crapmobiles because you need the flexibilty. That's at least $30,000 every 3-5 years, bye bye. Are you really saving anything? I admit that women on the average get paid less than men for similar jobs. That would be reason for me to quit. If I could stay home all day I would. Don't give me that crap about how hard it is to do the home jobs. I know how hard it is which is why it is a full time job and somebody has to be there full time. Now why are women working again? Because they want to. Plain and simple, they think they are supposed to now. 'Housewife' is now a frowned on title. Sure, everybody patronizes and says 'Oh, that's a tough job'. But they think 'Why don't you have a real job, loser?'. Somewhere, raising kids has become a parttime job or a hobby. That's a shame. Women used to take pride in their kids. Now kids seem to be some kind of burden. Forget the movies. Remember 'Hi, Mom'?
But the genie is out of the bottle. If every woman went back to the house, car makers could'nt charge outragious prices for cars. This is an example but everything costs more because of this 'extra money' that we all have now. So, there really is no extra money just big price tags. Thanks, ladies. Let me get that chair for you. Now the economy couldn't take the big price cuts because they'd still have to pay the big wages. Maybe they could...OK now there'd be fewer workers so payroll would go down. They'd have to hire somebody to take their place. That would be men since there are only 2 genders (yes 2). Hmm, unemplyment would disappear. Anybody left would be freeloaders and should starve. Kids would get the attention they deserve and be raised by an adult that cares about them, not just being paid to watch them. Us guys could come home to a clean(ish) house and a warm, willing, well rested (hehe, couldn't resist) wife. I think almost everybody would be happier. Those left over could be handled easier than the masses of divorce and domestic troubles that are prevalant now. Well, that's my plan. Let me get the door for you, maam. Give your kids a hug for me when you get home.

MAR 28 02(or so) Well, hello. Time for more of my thoughts. Today's op-ed is about that evil invention, the remote control. Specifically, the TV remote. Many years ago when one desired to change the looks of that novelty item, the television (TV), one got off of ones ... sofa to change the channel. There were only a few channels to choose from and most showed the same stuff but at different times. Sure the host might be different but a variety show was a variety show. One day somebody (I don't know or care who) decided he (these days one is supposed to say he/she but let's be real, chicks just kept up the home back then. (Now nobody does and so news anchors whine about 'why are the kids of today not raised in good homes? sob'.) (Take a guess)) could make some money by using radio signals to change the channels on everybody's TV. Thus he built a remote control so he could channel surf between his 2 or 3 local channels, woohoo. Now when Carson had dog acts on, one could press a button and change over to see what Ed Sullivan was up to (maybe some fly-by-night-english-band-named-after-a-bug), rather than getting up off ones'...sofa and change the channel. It now required no effort to just pop over to another station and see what was on. This went on about every 15 minutes for 1 minute because that was the commercial slots that were available (actually I think it was every 1/2 hour but I'm not sure since I was about 10 then. Sponsors would sponsor whole shows ("brought to you by..."). That was cool. Just one type of commercial instead of ads for American cars followed by ads for Jap(panzies) cars. If pall mall cigarettes wanted more time they had to go to a different network. The networks were selling a product, namely entertainment and they understood that people would just turn off the TV if there was nothing on and go visit neighbors or sit on the porch and sip lemonade or make home made ice cream (hand crank, not electric), yum. People still had the ability to entertain themselves (and they had porches). So if there were too many comercials, eg. like today, people would just turn the thing off. Enter cable TV. At first they carried local stations and a few out of town stations. Maybe a few cable only stations. This brought the channel count up to about 10 or so and some crap stations they had to make it look like you were getting alot for your money. Also they had a remote control with the cable box. This was the beginning of the end. Now you could park your...self on the sofa and click away. Clikety click all day long. Oh great, now the housebuilders didn't need to build porches anymore. We have remote controls. Still, we make out. Build your own porch and now you have the best of both. But...it turns out that the 'marketing/salesmen professionals/snake oil salesmen, scumbags et al. eg. TV spammers' also had cable. And where we saw entertainment, they saw opportunity. Opportunity to try to sell us more stuff we don't need. F...ine, now we had 2 minute commercials every 15 minutes. And there are a few cable channels that don't have commercials still. This is the mid 80's. Great times. However, eventually, more and more time was 'available for sale'. If you ever see a slot on TV that is about what will be on next week or later tonight or whatever, that means 'this spot for sale'. After all, nowadays they tell you what's coming on next while the crdits roll on the show you were watching. Think about that when the basta... station owners cut off part of the show you're watching so they can tell you whats coming up next. After all, you must not be able to work a TV guide or you'd have flipped over to another channel by now. Anyway, 3 minutes every 15 (some 44 minutes left of the show, 3 minutes before and after rolling the credits). So add more slots/make more money while still selling the same stuff. Like the same ad 5 times in one hour. OK, so for TV viewers, this means that you can switch channels during commercials. Oh goody. Don't read a book or anything, switch to another mindless channel. Good idea, except, most channels have commercials in the same slots. Have you ever changed to another channel and hit the same commercial? Almost like they planned it? That's because they all run comercials in the same slot. Ever had your favorite prime time show preempted by an infomercial? They sure know the average TV viewer. He will sit there with the remote and flip channels until the flashing lights are most pleasing. Duh, the ad jerks treat you like morons because when you have a remote, you act like morons. "Flunky: Sir, the morons have figured out how to change the channels during commercials. Sir: Just buy more time...Let our message go forth twice every commercial break. Maybe the morons will happen to land on our channel when our commercial is running and give up and watch our stupid ad. If it's flashy enough they will stop to stare at the marvel our ad agency has created like a baby looking at a disco ball. And we owe our ad agency 2 million for this latest ad campaign." Or maybe the viewing public will realize they are paying too high a price for the limited string of remakes and reruns the networks are running and turn off the moron boxes and grab a (commercial free) book. Maybe they will create a website and bore others with their opinions. We will see, but right now the same Ford commercial is on that has aired 4 times during Starsky and Hutch. Gotta switch channels.

OpEd Dec06: Today is my day off from work. I have been on the net all day much as I am every day off and most of my spare time. The fact is I have nothing else I would rather do than play on a computer. OK, I guess I'm supposed to say I'd rather spend time with my kids but the truth is, I'd rather be here than anywhere. My kids are welcome as long as they don't touch the keys. There are so many things to do on a computer if you make the time. But I'm here today to talk about broadband. Why? Because I love broadband. Now they are saying broadband is dying because not enough people want it...Why not? What are you people thinking of? You want drive thru fast food, cell phones, faxes, satellite TV, blow dryers, tv dinners, microwaves, fast cars, faster cars and putt putt golf? Anyway, you want faster and faster. Fast cars cost more, slow cars cost too much too. I don't think a generic car should cost over $10,000. Do we really need 2 radio antennas? Don't think you don't pay for that stupidity either. Anyway, we were talking about broadband. A good dial up will connect at about 3.4K/sec. Now that's fine for alot of webpages. They will load in a minute or two. But there are alot of pages out there that are just not worth looking at. Mine are all great but alot of them are less than great. Now you've wasted a couple of minutes waiting for this garbage to load and it's not worth it. Time gone and you can never get it back. Now a web page can run anywhere from a couple of kilobytes to a couple of megabytes depending on the IQ of the webmaster (i.e. the bigger the page the lower the IQ). Flash screens and gifs take time to download and may or may not be worth the wait. Well, with broadband the wait is cut conciderably. You waste less time. Broadband saves your finite time. Email downloads faster, if you run a website, uploads are faster. Everything online is faster. Why are you so patient with connection times? Maybe you are afraid if the time factor is taken out you will become as addicted as I am? Take the plunge, go broadband. You can always go back to dialup if you wish, hehe.
I've heard the arguments...It costs more...how much is your time worth? You'd rather eat fast food crap to save cooking time. If you have a second phone line maybe you can get cable for the same price as dialup and the extra line. If not, get it anyway. I only use it for email...that's because dialup is so slow. Get broadband and click stuff. They don't have broadband where I am...move. My kids are in school, I can't just move...good, then they are old enough to help you pack...move. I like it where I am now...if they don't have broadband, your place sucks...move. I might become addicted to the net...welcome to the club. Well, I hope you have weighed my arguments with yours and realized that broadband is the one true way to Web Goodness. If not, then you are probably still waiting for this page to load on your dialup. Enjoy...

OP-ED 12 OCT:

Greetings, welcome to yet another op-ed column. Today, my topic is a simple straightforward one. The U.S. economy. Yup, this is how I see it. Our economy is based on buying and selling. Companies make stuff and then try to sell it at a profit to support themselves and buy enough supplies to make more stuff to sell again. Some companies that make stuff are too big to be owned by any one person and so they have some paper which gives partial ownership of the company to whoever owns the paper. These shares are sold to the public to some extent but most of it is kept by the company to give out to top executives as part of their recruiting package along with salaries most of us can only dream about and bonuses that are more than what we make in a year or two. These shares are held by the big cheeses in the hope that they will go up. Sort of an incentive to do the job they were hired to do. If they do their jobs the stock will go up and so their pile of stock is worth more and therefore they are worth more. That is important to them, how much they are worth. Now, the stocks that are left over are traded on Wall St. These are a pitiful few of the shares in a company but these few shares determine how much the blocks that the execs have are worth. That makes the public shares very powerful but volatile. Sounds pretty flimsy to me. Let's see just how flimsy...
Each time a share is traded it is sold by someone who thinks the stock will go down. It is then bought by someone who thinks the stock will go up. Both cannot be right so someone has to lose out so everybody buys into many different stocks to make up the difference. At the end of the day the stock is up or down based on, get this, how much of it was traded. Sure, sometimes the stock goes up because the company does something to make it go up like invent a solar powered car or release the 17th variation of the same PC operating system which this time, dammit, really is the most stable and reliable and easiest one to use. But even then the value only goes up because the traders think it will be worth more and buy alot of shares thus making the value increase. Still sounds flimsy to me...How flimsy? OK.
Now, the economy always slumps when a new president is elected. Why? Because the traders expect it to so they don't buy as much as they would if the old pres was still there. It is expected but they are careful not to sell everything beforehand because that would cause a crash. Now, this slump is reported by the media as 'news' every time and the more they say 'the economy is down/flat/in a slump' whatever, the longer it is before trading gets back to normal. This time around, we were going from a liberal to a conservative administration so everyone expected a big slump and thus created one by selling off more and more stock. Well, guess what. The slump continues until the traders think the slump should be over and start buying. Now this is reported by the media as a recession and now the consumers (you and me) start getting worried about job cuts. Job cuts factor in because these days, a company that lays off workers gets they're stock bought because traders think it should be worth more. That's because they are seen as 'trimming the fat from the company' and will be making a profit (which will be divided between the company and the top execs). The problem is that companies have been 'trimming the fat' for years to give their stock a boost, again, divided up by the top dogs. To me, a company that can't make payroll is a failure and the execs are the ones to blame but they are rarely affected by layoffs. If they do get canned they have all kinds of severance packages in their contracts and usually get quite a chunk of change when they get fired. See, they can have a contract but they get really upset when the workers try to get a union so they have contracts too. Odd, isn't it? Back on topic...Job cuts, now the consumers start saving up money. They decide to wait on the new sport utility/snowmobile/computer/golfclubs etc...They still buy food and such but farmers and ranchers have been taking it in the shorts for decades now. So now we're starting to affect the real economy, not the Wall St. paper one...
Along comes a disaster, say psychopathic killers crash into the World Trade Centers and kill thousands. Now the media is distracted and does a pretty good job of doing their job, reporting the news (in case they've forgotten already). For two or three days anyway but then they slipped back into their old selves. Reporting the 'news' that experts didn't know how the economy would be affected. The experts didn't know anything and they reported that as news. When Wall St. opened of course the traders waited to see what would happen and only sold off a little 'just to be safe'. The problem is, eveybody sold off a little. Guess what, now the media reports a down trading day. I, for one, wasn't suprised in the least. Next day more stocks are sold off and again the media reports down trading. Now consumers are hearing it. 'The economy is down' so they are holding onto their money. Creating the slow economy that the media has already reported based on the stock market. And that really only affected the top dogs as we saw earlier. Now we have companies lining up to lay off workers and blaming the terrorist attacks for it. All these sorry bastards are doing is trying to keep their stock value up so they don't lose any of their personal assets. Some companies (my company) didn't even wait for the slump. They started it, by annoucing to the whole world that they were laying off thousands. They then went to the govenment and asked for loans (they are loans btw, not handouts as the media keeps saying) after they started laying off. Yes I'm talking about an airline, in fact the first airline to announce layoffs. They started this whole mess 4 days after the attacks (on a Saturday, so their stock would'nt get dumped whenever the market opened, how sleesy. 5000 innocent victims killed and all these cheesedicks can think of is their money). If you paid attention you know what airline I mean. (If not, it starts with a C and ends in ontinental). Again, just to keep their personal stocks from dropping. And, of course, when the companies recover the heads will all give themselves a big bonus for doing such a great job of keeping the company going. Of course, the laid off workers are still laid off. Maybe they'll get to come back but most will take paycuts if they do. And the extra profit gets split up among the top dogs. Ah, the American economy. Always a good excuse to drink...
Bail us out of this mess, people. Go out and buy stuff, stuff you don't really need. Give the economy the boost it needs. Lord knows the idiots running the system can't seem to figure out what's wrong. Take care, all.

SEP 19: Hello all, welcome to my latest op-ed. Again, I start typing and have to wait to see what comes out. Today is the 1 week +1 day anniversary of the cowardly, sneaky, unwarranted attack on the World Trade Center Towers and the Pentagon. I waited hoping I could keep from sounding like I was filled with hate for those responsible. Let me preface with this: I hope you camel humping desert scum are rotting in Hell, you son of a whore camel bastards. I guess waiting hasn't helped.

Ok, so some 20 middle eastern 'undocumented immigrants'(that's what my local paper calls them) came into our country and killed some 5000 of our citizens. What in the hell were they thinking. Yeah, Allah and all that. Die in the Jihad and get a hundred beautiful wives in the afterlife or some crap. Maybe if they got laid here they wouldn't be so willing to die to get some. What in the hell are these assholes thinking? My theory is that since they don't have trees, they don't have toilet paper and so they all have sore asses. Add to that that their women are so ugly they have to cover them up until after the wedding (but you can have many wives. Four is what I heard from some Saudis so it's a crap shoot. But you have to treat them all the same.) and the fact that it's just so damn hot and you can see that most people would flip out. That is no excuse. They still suck. So now some Afganis are going to get blown to hell and for what? Some rich asshole desert rat wants to exert his influence over the weak minded. 'I will pay for your flight training and you will become a pilot. Then you will crash into a building and die and get a hundred beautiful wives etc.' What crap. You stupid bastards are dead. You die and rot in Hell if there's any justice. Did I mention that you suck? Morons.
Which brings me to a couple of religious folks. Good Christians, Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. Where in the hell to start with these two idiots? Here they are, on TV saying how that we brought this on ourselves. What kind of moronic bullshit is this? These two dickheads have been the bane of southerners for years. They're fanatical to the extreme. They blame gays, abortionists, feminists and the ACLU for this and everything else too. (I blame the assholes driving the planes). These two are as bad as that bin Laden prick. They just aim at a different target. FYI, I'm not a gay, feminist, abortionist or ACLU member. I'm what you'd call mainstream, though I do tend to lean to the right on most topics the media concidered news a couple of weeks back. Anyway, these two 'good Christians' are using the death of 5000 Americans to push their cause and the casualties don't matter. Well, I think we should pay no attention to these losers. They are not much better than the assholes responsible for this mess. They too are religeous fanatics but with airconditioning, toilet paper and one wife (and maybe a few mistresses).
Now if I sounded flipant at all, I assure you this is by no means humourous to me. I am outraged. This was a sneaky bastard attack and nothing less than an act of war. I've watched more news this week than I ever have and I'd love to get my hands on that bin Laden bastard. But let's not feed on each other. Middle eastern Americans are still Americans and we don't need to turn on each other. And we must all be willing to sacrifice for the sake of security right now. Peace be with us and God bless the innocent casualties of this.

My 2cents on the KSAT News security article here.

op-ed:6 July: The Death of an Armadillo (for all my PETA pals)

This weekend was the Fourth of July, a party weekend for most. But an armadillo did not survive.
Me and my family went to visit some friends for the holiday. My wife had a day off and I was on my weekend which falls in the middle of the week. So we loaded up the van for a day trip and went to hang with our friends who live in the boonies south of Gonzales, Texas.
It was a hot day and humid too. I started out drinking Shaefer Light (the official beer of cheap webmasters). As the day wore on I was not looking forward to the drive home which takes about 2 1/2 hours. My wife was having a good time and I decided that it was too hot to drink cheap beer anyway, so I would not drink too much and would drive home. She had apparantly decided the same thing because she stopped drinking too. The afternoon wore on and we needed a fireworks run so I decided I had not had enough beer to affect me much and off we went. We ran up to Yoakum and bought some fireworks. We saw a opossum getting ate up by a buzzard on the way. It was in the other lane so I decided to nail the buzzard, if I could, on the way back. I hate buzzards. On the way back the buzzard spotted me and flew up into a tree while I went by. Rats. We happened to discuss what to do if an animal ran out in front of you. We, being guys in the country, said that it would be too bad but better to snuff a woodland critter than to swerve and run into a tree and would steer straight on. How profetic. We headed back to the party. It was still hot and humid. I was guzzeling bottled water like it was a new idea. I had a couple more beers too just to break up the monotony and conserve the water. Was I drunk? No, I had maybe 8 beers in 12 hours and sweated a bunch so I stunk too.
Fireworks time!! All I wanted was to get on the road home. A shower, I sure would love a shower. OK, I have'nt blown off firecrackers since I was about 10 so I wanted to do that too but I sure would love a shower. BTW, horses don't like fireworks. OK, so after the locals got the horse back into the pen, which she had kicked down when the fireworks started going off, we started tossing fire crackers into the fire. Ya gotta have a fire in the country since there's no light pollution you can't see anything at night.
OK, so the point is? Finally, this hot, sticky gala affair is over, more or less. Great time, but I want a damn shower. I could, of course get a shower there but I'd have to put on the same clothes, yuk. Anyway, the kids are ready to leave because they did'nt argue when we told them to get ready to leave, whew. Packing up and goodbyes time. I'm driving, patting myself on the back for moderation though if I had drank too much the heat might have killed me, we set out. I'm wearing my glasses which I don't have to wear but I like to see at night especially if I don't know the road. We head out, speed less than 60mph cause it's the law and besides I'm in a new van and I have the family in there. I see a critter up ahead and think 'another dead animal in the road' and veer to the right so I won't smash him more than he already is. A millisecond later I think 'it's quite 3 dimentional for roadkill' and the wife says 'armadillo'. Then I see that we have an intact armadillo in front of us. I veer to the left but the road is crowned and I don't really know what is on the left so I don't veer too much. Just enough to clear the thing if he does'nt move. There is a ditch on the right and I percieve a tree and a house on the left. Well, if the stupid thing does'nt move maybe... Damn, he started moving to the left. He's just walking along like it's another trip to the watering hole. So I did the only thing I could do. I cut right again so I wouldn't hit him with the wheels. Why do they do that? If he had turned around or just stayed still he'd be there to get run over today. But he didn't...thump...thump...thump.
I hate buzzards but they do provide a good clean-up service.
So, the point of this piece seems to be, don't to lose control of your car and crash into a tree trying to avoid hitting some animal. Drive safe, ya'll.

op-ed 15May01: FS Division

Once upon a time there was an online community. The FlightSim community. It was a collection of folks who had met in the GamingZone or online somewhere and got to know one another. Had they met in person, at a Starbucks or a Jims or in a mall, they might have chated for a bit and probably parted, wanting to continue the relationship but not really knowing how. Do you ask another guy for his phone number, so you can call him sometime? (For the girls, the answer is no you can't!) Due to the pressures of life or a previous commitment, they parted never knowing or maybe not really caring, how to get in contact with the person they had shared time and chat with, even if they seemed to have a common interest and maybe thought a new friend had been found. There is no way for them to establish a fast friendship. But, had they met in the Zone, maybe flew together, found a common frame of reference such as flying Alaska or Nepal (my favorite) or IFR or 747's or Piper Cubs or whatever, there is an opportunity to get to know someone, chat, share interests. After all, once you're at cruise and trimmed up there isn't much to do. To make a long story short, friendships are formed in the zone, flying multiplayer, online. Soon, you get online, hoping to see some of your friends online too. You live in the zone, waiting to see if your friends sleep in an extra hour, hoping they don't because you want to share your night's flying with them, or just chat. Just say 'Hi'. All is great with the world, life is good.
Then, one day Microsoft announces a new version of FS, FS2000. Hmm, sounds good you think. 'I'll have to see how it looks'. FS98 is a great sim but 'Maybe they have improved on it and thus we can have even more fun. Cool screenshots and the minimum hardware requirement isn't too much more than FS98 and it's less than what I have, maybe we can start flying in 2k'. Then you try it, oh my. 'Why is it so jerky? It doesn't want to even start unless I have just done a restart. But my system is way over the minimum required hardware?' So, you fiddle with it for 6 months. MS releases a patch (8meg) to fix the kludge. It doesn't help. They release patch v2 (9meg). Finally, you have added 8bit clouds and tinkered and got the thing to run in a small window, but frames are somewhat stable and you can fly online. Meanwhile, some of your online pals have gotten new computers just to be able to run FS2k. The rest have stayed on 98 and you don't know what to do because you can get along in 2k but still prefer FS98 and some of your zone friends are in one room while the others are in another room. So, you try to balance your time and catch whoever you think might be on. The result? You never catch anyone on and meanwhile, the zone chats are taken over by flamers (ones who flame but if the shoe fits...), VA commercials (speaks for itself) or kiddies who don't even have FS but have gotten into the chat room and love to see how much they can get away with. Meanwhile, the sysops have been reorganized and any control they had has been taken away because MS supersysop has gotten too many complaints about sysops just trying to do the job they were hired (and not paid) for.
Then outcomes FScombat2. 'OK, here we are' you think. The preeminent flightsim. This is what we've been waiting for. Rah, rah, rah. Actually, it works better than 2k on my hardware but then it really has less to do. However MS being MS has to put up 40 plane dogfights, knowing that the majority of the hardware out there won't handle it. (Just to catch the ones who liked CFS and didn't care about FS2k).
OK, I went and got a new computer so I could run CFS2 (getting stuck with Windows Me, an Evil mix of 98 and NT that no sane company would think of releasing unless they had a corner on the market, probably an XP testbed, in the process). Despite me not having 396megs of RAM or whatever, FS2k and CFS2 run okay. 128meg RAM and 1.4ghz AMD.
Now, there is talk of FS02. Oh, and this one won't require any faster hardware than 2k. Fool me once...
In short, I blame MicroSoft for the dismanteling of the FS community and the inability to police ourselves. We tried but our attentions were divided by the release of too many inferior products and we had to spend too much time just getting the things to run. Thus losing control of the zone.
As a result, some online friends have moved on, some are still there but into other things. Some, like me, don't go to the zone anymore.
I blame MicroSoft for the fragmentation of the FS community.

op-ed 5Mar01:
This oped is on a subject that really bugs me. OK, not that much but I believe in literacy and the blurring of the meanings for the words 'affect' and 'effect' is not helping matters. This blurring is exacerbated by the net so I will use this same tool in an attempt to reverse, stem or slow the trend.

affect: to have an effect on; influence; produce a change in.
effect: anything brought about by a cause or agent; result.

So, we can see that the two words do not mean the same thing thus cannot be used interchangably. How many times have you read that something 'effected' something or someone. This is wrong. Something can be 'affected'. A change can have an 'effect'. It does not cause an 'affect' though it can have an 'affect'. (I saw 'affect' used like that in my own city's newspaper which is the only time I've really noticed affect misused). Well, this has had the effect of confusing me so I shall effect a closing before I'm adversely affected but remember, nothing can 'effect' you or anyone else.

op-ed January 9 2001: (A Tripod Webmaster's Christmas Story)

Well, here we are, in a new year. Happy New Years, everybody. OK, that's out of the way. Now, on with the show. Here is the latest op-ed. I'm sorry to say it is directed at my very own host, Tripod. I have been on Tripod not that long but I have been on this planet long enough to have an idea of what's going on. I have a few sites on Tripod which I try to keep in a state of flux. It's a lot of work and very time consuming. I must add that since I intend to make no money from this endevor and only do it for the benefit of a few of my friends and any one else who stumbles across this site, the additions that I make to the sites and the little feedback that I get is my only reward. I do enjoy it. It is fun to try to come up with things to put up and then try to figure out how to make them or where to find them. It is also not my policy to complain about something that is given to me for Free. However, I feel that I must vent somehow and this is my chosen venue. Thus, the story begins. Shortly before Thanksgiving 2000 I started getting my sites holiday compliant. I put up Thanksgiving decorations on most of my sites. Some were sent to me and some I found. I had a great time. They looked good. Thanksgiving came and went and I started adding Christmas decorations to my sites. Once again, I had a great time and they looked good. However, a couple of days before Christmas I was no longer able to make changes to my .html sites (of which this is not one). Nor was I able to take down my Thanksgiving decorations, thus making my sites look neglected and sloppy. I continued to work on my sitebuilder sites and make them Christmas ready. Once again, I had a good time. I would have liked to change all my sites but it's the holidays and the engineers are probably off for the holidays. Well, oh my, the day before Christmas all my sites were locked out. I could'nt change anything! Well, once again, the engineers must be off for the holidays. Christmas came and went. The builder sites came back up. They are, however, limited as to what you can add to the pages. That's why I learned some html. New Years was coming. I sent an email (not email as we know it but a block that you have to fill in) to Tripod describing my woes. (Errors when I try to manage the files in file manager). Alas, no reply was forthcoming and still no joy on the html sites. New Years Eve, nada. I had some great fireworks to add but nope, twas not meant to be. New Years came and went. I spent it shopping for a new server. I spent the next weekend looking too. I tried a couple but they did not meet my needs (catering to idiots). I signed up for fortunecities and wasted a few hours before I resigned. I tried MSN communities. I have'nt figured out how to resign from them yet. I tried one which I don't recall but it had a witch site as 'site of the month'. I looked at NBCi but they have a permanent commercial bar taking up space on everybodys browser. I then signed up for Geocities. This one is not bad. Pretty similar to Tripod filemanager. I copied one of my sites over there. Still it's different from what I was used to. Then I had an idea. Want to know what it was? OK, I thought so. I started a new account on Tripod. Yup, just put up a new name and I'm in again. I have copied all my .html sites over (see the 'Links' page) but how to swap the builder sites? There I'm hung. Ironic, is'nt it? I start the new account because I can't edit the html files and now I can't figure out how to copy over the sites that were working. I would laugh but I'm too busy. Well, life's rough and I know that but today I get an email from Tripod. It was about the 'temporary interruption error'. Well, this one is a fact of life at tripod and I just ignore it. You have to redo a lot of work sometimes but it's not too often unless you're typing a long op-ed column (save it to notepad before clicking 'Done'). They even included a copy of my email which had said nothing about 'temporary interuption' and said their engineers were working on the problem. Keep in mind, this has been over 2 weeks and over a week since I emailed them (which explains why they say that the problem will probably be cleared up by the time they respond). Sure thing. Well, once again, life is a tough business and I will press on having already figured out a partial solution. Though I am somewhat upset about the whole affair, I resolve to work around it and press on but.... There's always a but. I happened to go to the sitebuilder site today under my new alias and I found out what they have been working on over the holidays. Instead of fixing my file manager, they have been working on this geek dude and his fancy sitebuilder sign in screen. Oh my. Well, life is rough and I don't complain about free stuff.

(Don't worry about me, I have moved in and converted as required. Thanks for not bothering me while I was in turmoil, or for some time there after, in fact not at all. Well keep that silence coming in folks. :ed) _____________________________________________________

Notice to P.E.T.A.: It's Thanksgiving and I invite all PETA fanatics over to my place for turkey. I might even have some endangered spiecies on the grill if the Greenpeace and the Sierra club drop by. Bon apitete.

amendment: 30 Oct 00

VEGETARIAN FOODS APPEAR ON PRISON MENUS.

I heard about this a few days ago but confirmation came from the PETA site itself. The courts have ruled that the Bureau of Prisons must provide a vegitarian diet for prisoners. Guess who pays for this special diet for convicts. Yup, you and I. Thanks to a suit brought by a prisoner named Keith Maydak who supposedly 'is morally opposed to killing animals for food and adheres to a completely animal-free diet'. I'd love to know what he's in for. Washington -- Now on the menu at a federal prison near you: Tofu marinara, veggie burgers, braised tofu, and vegetarian "chicken" and "meatballs." All are part of the Bureau of Prison's new "No-Flesh Alternative" program, which makes vegan food available to all federal prisoners at every meal. Oh well. Still, my favorite part of the article is a quote from some PETA mouthpiece. Says PETA's Bruce Friedrich. "It should help us all sleep a little better to know we're taking away violent criminals' taste for blood." Now that's funny. Just shows that too much vegetables will rot your mind.

Update 16 Nov 00: This was just too good to ignore... From the pages of The Darwin Awards: Two animal rights activists were protesting the cruelty of sending pigs to a slaughterhouse in Bonn by freeing a captive herd. Suddenly all two thousand of pigs stampeded through the gate they were opening, and trampled the hapless protesters to death. For a good time call P.E.T.A

The Darin Awards.

_________________________

LETTERS!

To poke holes in my arguments or lend your support click this: